by Anita Brown
Paranormal and supernatural are two very common terms that are quite often  both used to describe the same things.  But how many of us know what these  terms really mean, and how are they different?  My title at  Examiner.com is the Paranormal Examiner, and today, that is literally what I am  going to do.
Paranormal is generally defined by most sources  as phenomena that is "beyond the range of normal experience or scientific  explanation".
Supernatural is defined as anything above or  beyond what one holds to be natural and exists outside natural law and the  observable universe.
On the surface these two definitions seem to be very similar, but they  aren't.  One states that it is only outside of scientific explanation (and I  would take this to mean current scientific explanation), while the  other states that it is above and beyond what is natural, period.
Science tends to naturalize things, using a process known  as methodological naturalism, and categorizes all that cannot be  investigated empirically as nonexistent.  When looking at mainstream science and  the methods used, it would seem that to ever prove that either the paranormal or  the supernatural are real is a waste of time and effort.  I believe this to be  true regarding the supernatural.  It's definition alone should tell us all that  it is a term we should refrain from using at all.  But is using the word  paranormal doing us any favors?
There is another, lesser used form of naturalism called metaphysical  naturalism, and I believe that proving the existence of the paranormal is  not only a valid use of our time in attempting to do so, but also quite  possible.
"Metaphysical naturalism, or ontological  naturalism, is a world view and belief system that holds that there is nothing  but natural things, forces, and causes of the kind studied by the natural  sciences, i.e. those required to understand our physical environment and having  mechanical properties amenable to mathematical modeling. Metaphysical naturalism  holds that all concepts related to consciousness or to the mind refer to  entities which are reducible to or supervene on natural things, forces and  causes. More specifically, it rejects the objective existence of any  supernatural thing, force or cause, such as occur in humanity’s various  religions, as well as any form of teleology. It sees all 'supernatural' things  as explainable in purely natural terms. It is not merely a view about what  science currently studies, but also about what science might discover in the  future."
Note that metaphysical naturalism rejects the existence of the supernatural,  but not the paranormal.  Remember, the supernatural is the one that is above and  beyond what is natural, period.  The definition also states that this is a view  of not only what we currently know, but what we have yet to discover.  I believe  that this would include the paranormal.
If we were to apply metaphysical naturalism to our investigation and  research, if we look within the natural for explanations of everything,  not just everything that we can explain at this moment, I believe we will find  the answers and the proof that we are looking for.
What if everything we find on an investigation has a natural explanation?   The thump in the wall caused by a loose pipe has a natural explanation that we  already know, we don't need to find and prove it.  But what if the EVP clip has  a natural explanation as well?  What if the phantom touch on the arm has a  perfectly natural explanation?  What if that which we call ghost, spirit,  intelligent being, inhuman being, soul, all have natural explanations that we  just have to find?
If we were to all let go of the idea of the "supernatural" and "paranormal"  for a moment, and look at all that is natural before us, it is possible to find  exactly how these unknown entities work and exist.  There was a time when  magnets were thought of to be magic.  We all know now that magnetism is a  perfectly natural occurrence.  But someone had to take those natural things  around us and unlock the combination of that which is natural of this earth and  universe to find out what made those magnets work.
I believe that everything we learn within science should be a building block  for what we do not yet know.  We all spend so much of our time trying to  document apparitions, capture EVP clips, have realtime communication...we think  we are gathering proof, but the bottom line is that all we are proving is that  there is something out there that we have no proof of, and we accomplish nothing  but offering up yet another video/photo/audio clip for the hardcore skeptics to  have a field day with.  Without knowing what these things really are and what  they are really caused by, we know absolutely nothing other than we have a bunch  of interesting pictures and other data to argue over.
What if instead, we were to look more at what it is that already exists on  this earth that these beings are made of?  What if we were to look at what we  experience as the natural, and not the supernatural, as the normal, and not the  paranormal, and focus on deciphering what causes the appearance of a ghost the  same way that men once deciphered what caused the stars to move in the sky each  night?
Humans have DNA, atoms and molecules, water and matter, all within us.  So  does every other living creature on the planet, but it is  the combination of those things that make each creature unique.  These  are all physical things that we know to exist, as well.  But there are plenty of  unseen things that we know to exist on this planet as well.  There is gravity,  electromagnetic energy, the atmosphere, the heliosphere, even the air..they are  all unseen and accepted by science.
So what combination of these and/or other unseen forces that we already know  exist are causing what we have come to call paranormal activity?  And if we find  this combination, does that negate that what we are experiencing is caused by  something outside of what we previously knew, that is an intelligent and  separate being?  Not necessarily.  All that it negates is that it is unknown or  not normal.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment